DATATOMIC / METHOD

Start with observation.
Follow the question.

An empirical starting point, informed by grounded theory. Observations shape the explanation; mathematics makes its assumptions and consequences explicit.

MORE THAN ONE WAY TO REASON

Induction helps identify patterns. Abduction develops plausible explanations. Deduction asks what should follow if an explanation is correct.

We move between these modes as the question demands, returning to observations whenever a model needs to be challenged.

  1. 01

    Observe

    Begin with a phenomenon, a discrepancy, or a pattern that deserves a closer look.

  2. 02

    Find the pattern

    Compare observations. Look for relationships, exceptions, and competing interpretations.

  3. 03

    Propose explanations

    Develop more than one plausible explanation and identify what each assumes.

  4. 04

    Formalize

    Use mathematics or a computational model to make the idea precise and derive its consequences.

  5. 05

    Test

    Use measurements, simulations, or prototypes. Compare with a baseline and look for evidence against the proposal.

  6. 06

    Revise & share

    Refine or abandon the model. Document assumptions, results, limitations, and the next question.

WHEN THE MACHINE CANNOT YET BE BUILT

Make the assumptions visible.

Mathematics can expose contradictions, establish limits, and specify what a future experiment would need to measure. Simulations examine consequences under chosen assumptions. Evidence from the physical world is needed to establish whether those assumptions describe reality.

RESEARCH STAGES

Say where the work stands.

01

Question

A phenomenon and a bounded question worth investigating.

02

Model

A proposed explanation with assumptions and derived consequences.

03

Simulation

A computational experiment under specified conditions.

04

Prototype

An implementation that makes the proposed mechanism observable.

05

Empirical result

Measurements with a baseline, uncertainty, and stated limitations.

These stages describe different kinds of work. A project may revisit an earlier stage as evidence changes.

THE PRACTICAL TOOLKIT

Tools follow the question.

01 / DISCIPLINE

Artificial intelligence

Systems that retrieve, reason, and work with language.

  • LLM systems
  • Agentic workflows
  • Retrieval systems
  • Machine learning
  • Natural language processing
  • AI-assisted applications

02 / DISCIPLINE

Data + intelligence

Find structure in information. Keep the evidence in view.

  • Data engineering
  • Analytics
  • Signal extraction
  • Alternative data
  • Visualization
  • Information fusion

03 / DISCIPLINE

Quantitative systems

Make assumptions explicit and put models to the test.

  • Financial modeling
  • Algorithmic analysis
  • Market intelligence
  • Backtesting
  • Risk analysis
  • Signal development

04 / DISCIPLINE

Software engineering

Turn research into systems people can actually use.

  • Web applications
  • APIs
  • Automation
  • Data pipelines
  • Rapid prototyping
  • Product engineering

05 / DISCIPLINE

Cyber + intelligence

Understand digital behavior through structured investigation.

  • Cybersecurity research
  • Threat intelligence
  • Malware and data analysis
  • Structured intelligence workflows

06 / DISCIPLINE

Experimental R&D

Build just enough to find out what is possible.

  • Prototype development
  • Technical feasibility
  • Emerging technologies
  • New interfaces
  • New product concepts

METHOD IN CONTEXT

The grounded-theory influence comes from its iterative relationship between observations and developing theory. Physical and computational questions also require methods appropriate to their evidence.

Grounded theory · Kathy Charmaz & Antony Bryant